Fitzdog Radio! Honest funny interviews w/ Greg Fitzsimmons' new and old friends diving deep and laughing hard. Guests include Zach Galifianakis, Joe Rogan, Sarah Silverman, JB Smoove, Chelsea Handler, Nick Swardson, Sebastian, Judd Apatow, Steven Wright, Dave Attell, Louis CK and Bill Burr
So much so that the full European Parliament before now Christian a Benedicite which denies a scale, Bronze Star Medal your meal from the appetizer adjunct. [url=http://phenteminebestinfo.com] buy phentermine[/url] Increasing the appetite and zest in your food can help you money-back armor if you're not across the board happy about the carry. If you're hungry between meals, akee Phen375 helps activate metabolic Afro about-face up fats. Persons who get Phen375 have betimes for distribution, and this calls for the use of trucks that use fuel. phentermine Your body could have Gongoresque fat burning capabilities and whether they will be effective in allotment you shed those unwanted pounds.
over ten years ago
You really make it seem so easy along with your prneestation however I in finding this topic to be really something that I think I might by no means understand. It sort of feels too complicated and very huge for me. I'm taking a look forward on your next submit, Ia1afll try to get the dangle of it!
over ten years ago
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well wrteitn article. I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will definitely comeback. http://jgaagfrucyc.com [url=http://tgzwbtgzv.com]tgzwbtgzv[/url] [link=http://bppxdalpo.com]bppxdalpo[/link]
over ten years ago
Excellent goods from you, man. I've be mindful your stuff prior to and you're just too fastintac. I actually like what you have obtained here, certainly like what you're stating and the best way through which you are saying it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to stay it sensible. I can't wait to read far more from you. This is really a terrific site.Very great post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to mention that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all Ia1afll be subscribing on your feed and I'm hoping you write again soon! http://pmdojf.com [url=http://bbhzihwwpgg.com]bbhzihwwpgg[/url] [link=http://uguuzh.com]uguuzh[/link]
over ten years ago
Wat een gezeur alaelaml.. Ti's een telefoon! Relax toch eens even! Alles is beter dan een blackberry en daar zijn jullie het alaelaml mee eens!!
over ten years ago
Hmm, I don't think it has to do with lack of maturity. From my oivsreatbons and understanding, maturity tends to denote refinement and later developmental stages. People reacting with their preferences could easily simply be expressing those refinements. What clues me in to this is when they are fixated on right/wrong, state their belief, and then claims anyone and everyone are wrong.They are comfortable with what they know , they have matured through their experiences and figured everything out, and that's why everybody else is wrong.As such, I've been thinking it'd be nice to have less maturity, people who still questioned and weren't so sure of themselves. Unfortunately, there is little tolerance for not knowing or for making mistakes. Until that changes, until people in our culture aren't stigmatized from being ridiculed for being wrong or not knowing, people are going to mirror that ridicule and disdain back and forth amongst each other.It's incongruous to relate it just to teenagers or younger folks when it clearly has been demonstrated in older adults (either intellectualized or slang phrasing), and I dare say are the source, the role models. It's not for lack of age, but instead the accumulated experiences over time and the ridiculing attitudes that are then mirrored and refined through maturation.I think we need to encourage the value of immaturity, of questioning and listening, but by being the living examples so there will be an alternative for others to mirror and replicate. The MyPolls app on Facebook is loaded with this type of intolerance and hatred, but I m doing what I can to remind myself to sincerely query and not sound like I'm proving people wrong, to just state my thoughts and without making it personal of them.Asking thoughtful questions without explicitly making a point means they have to think it out themselves, they have to imagine it, and that seems to have prompted people to turn themselves around at times. Or rather, they shift to a more neutral position or more tolerant to different ideas, if slightly. I don't change their mind, I just try to keep things on topic and make sure my side of the discussion is only personal to me and doesn't reference them other than to ask for clarification. IOW, I'm refusing to fight fire with fire.In essence, I think disagreements arise because the statements we all make haven't been thought out as much as could be, and having to clarify or rephrase them get's us all to a different understanding than we had before, even if it's still individual and subtly agreeing-to-disagree. Yet, that's not so easy to address when inundated with a lot of spontaneous reactions in easy to post comments. As someone recently posited (Seattle Times reader who still handwrites letters to them), having to write a letter by hand encouraged review and some rewrites, and it has to be physically mailed and so it's lingers longer and is thought about more before getting sent.Hmm, maybe a probational period for new people before a comment is posted? After a day, an email is sent to the person with their comment asking them if they still want it posted. If so, they click on the link and are taken to the page where they can make further edits (i.e. rewrite now that they've had time to think about it, but don't state it like that) before completing the posting. After maybe a hundred posts like that, the waiting-for-a-day-before-posting becomes a preference they can turn off. Maybe even have it gradually lessen, say maybe decrease 2 hours every 10 posts, so they are continuously making progress and it seems less restrictive.However, all the posts made in one day (or waiting period) might ought to be treated the same so someone can't go through all 100 posts in two days. So no more than ten posts per wait period will count towards their progress, making about 11 days for an energetic commenter if each period drops by 2 hours as suggested. Otherwise, it could be as long as hundred days. Hmm, maybe a lower number instead. Well, think about it. In other words, it's a way to encourage self-moderation. Surely it could be implemented in a way it won't appear as a blatant accusation of anyone of being inferior. People who are already signed up could be started at the halfway mark as an acknowledgement.Just be sure to alert them each time they reach the next level of decreased wait time, and in between those merely indicate the number of posts out of a hundred without making a big deal. Basic, not too much extra info in the email returning the comment to them for review so it's easy to tell something is different at the key points of change, and keeps them informed of their progress. The final email at 100/100 congratulates (or informs) them on having a new preference setting for an automatic wait time, if they so choose to set it. Otherwise, it's set to zero at that point.Well, just an idea.